NWI Patriots Blog

September 2, 2010

What is the Tea Party Movement?

What is the Tea Party Movement?
A Personal View by Martin Henrichs

Rick Santelli’s rant on the floor of Chicago Board of Trade broadcast on CNBC in early 2009 was the spark that ignited the Tea Party movement. The American people woke up!

I was motoring down I-75 in Florida in February 2009 when I heard a radio talk show host fired up about a “Tea Party”. It was the first I had heard of it. At the Residence Inn
I picked up a USA Today and read a timely article describing what this Tea Party mania was all about—a reassertion of values which make America exceptional in the world.

Doug Mainwaring, a Tea Party founder, recalls in the August 23, 2010, Washington Times that it was “Main Street America’s indictment against the ruling class.” It was an eruption of sanity and reason, of stewardship and goodwill.” It was “not Democrat or Republican, but about the American people versus the hubris of politics as usual in Washington.”

It is about individual freedom and the future of our nation. In 1900 government only took
3% of our income, meaning we were 97% free, by 2000 government took 40% leaving us 60% free, but the bonds are tightening around our wrists.

The Tea Party calls attention to this trend toward slavery, as Mainwaring so eloquently states, “Success or failure hinges on dealing with our grave internal threat—the Leviathan that our government has become, the unsustainable entitlements, the incomprehensible enormity of our debt, the conceit of social engineering and command-and-control governance, the profligacy of Washington spending and the resulting confiscatory taxation to pay for it all. Most of all, it is the annihilation of our children’s future prosperity and liberty.

The Tea Party movement is reasserting America’s founding principles in the Declaration of Independence and The Constitution–that our unalienable rights are from God, not the government. That these rights include life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

According to Mainwaring, “There is a Grand Canyon-sized chasm between the mentality of Main Street America and that of our ruling class. Through the Tea Party movement, we are witnessing the rightful and necessary ascendancy of Main Street America over the Beltway, K Street (lobbyists) and Wall Street.—a cadre of legislators, members of the executive branch, lobbyists, union leaders, chief executives of for-profits and nonprofits, elitist members of media and academia.”

For too long we have witnessed the same tyranny our forefathers departed their home shores to escape—imposition of taxes and regulations without representation. Washington government is acting in complete disregard for constitutional limitations.

Mainwaring asks, “How much dead weight and cost are added through creating of enormous government bureaucracies, robbing the private sector of both capital and human resources? How much hard work and ingenuity has been stifled because of oversized welfare programs? How many people have been robbed of self-reliance and the joy of achievement because of entitlements? How much liberty, freedom and prosperity have we traded away over the years to fill the progressives voracious hunger to engineer our society?”

The Tea Party movement is not a few political firemen directing a hose of followers at a raging big government prairie fire. Rather, it is a rising tide of individuals who will peacefully smother what threatens to burn the American dream and exceptional way of life.

As Mainwaring puts it, “These are vast legions of confident, autonomous individuals who have experienced deep in their souls a very personal calling to preserve, protect and defend their nation.”

Permission is granted to reproduce this with proper acknowledgement.

Concerned Citizens,

Please forward this onto all your family and friends!!

God Bless America!!

July 15, 2010

Federalism and the Incorporation Doctrine

Most people do not understand the Incorporation Doctrine. This is, in part, because it is one of those fluid legal doctrines that the US Supreme Court makes up as it goes along. Sometimes we love it, other times we hate it. The recent cases involving the Second Amendment all involve the incorporation doctrine. I have drawn heat from some on message boards suggesting that the cases were wrong and that we cannot claim state’s rights when it is convenient for us, and claim Second Amendment rights when we choose to do so.

I thought I would outline, to the best of my limited ability, the history of the incorporation doctrine, what it is and what it is not. First, lets simply say that the incorporation doctrine refers to incorporation of the bill of rights into the 14th Amendment. The 14th Amendment states, in pertinent part:

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Often referred to as the equal protection clause, this provision was passed in 1868 after the Civil War. In 1897, the City of Chicago wanted to take some land for the widening of a road. Included in that land was some railroad property. Statute provided an opportunity for a hearing to ensure that land was taken for public purposes and to determine the value. The compensation awarded to the railroad by a jury was $1.00. ( Chicago Burlington and Quincy Railroad vs. City of Chicago http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&cou… )

The railroad appealed the trial court decision and the Illinois Supreme Court affirmed the jury award of $1.00. Here is where it gets interesting. The railroad then asked the federal district court to examine the case under the 14th amendment. Were they deprived of ” . . . property . . . without due process of law?” The State of Illinois argued they had all the process they were due, a hearing and the ability to present the facts of their case. I am not going to go on ad nauseum about the facts or history of this case but suggest that you read it in its entirety yourself. Again, here is the link: (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&cou… )

The legal principle which came out of the Chicago Burlington case was that the Federal Courts could review a state Court proceeding to ensure compliance with the Bill of Rights under the 14th Amendment. As is often the case, this is later expanded upon greatly by the Courts. While no one is disputing that individuals and corporations should be paid just compensation for property taken for public purposes, the question is whether the Federal Courts are the proper forum to determine what constitutes just compensation. Today we do not question the fact that the Federal Courts intervene in state decisions as to just compensation for a whole host of issues.

The incorporation doctrine was largely unused for 50 years after the Chicago Burlington case. Justice Hugo Black argued strongly in a dissent that the 14th Amendment incorporated all of the first 8 Amendments of the United States Constitution. (“‘no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States’ seem to me an
eminently reasonable way of expressing the idea that henceforth the
Bill of Rights shall apply to the States.” (Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 US 145 1968) The Court has always refused this “mechanical incorporation” principle but has since selectively incorporated much of the Bill of Rights into federal jurisprudence via the 14th Amendment. Today the 14th Amendment is the most frequently cited basis for federal jurisdiction. Several federal laws have been passed relying primarily on the principles of the 14th Amendment.

Although I do not agree with all of the statements in this article, I would suggest you check out the Wikipedia article on the incorporation doctrine at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_doctrine

In the 1950′s and 1960′s the Supreme Court began using the incorporation doctrine to declare that a number of federal rights applied to the states. Especially in the area of criminal law, the Court essentially rewrote state jurisprudence requiring the right to an attorney, the requirement of a search warrant, the right to a jury trial and a host of other procedural and substantive rights. Virtually EVERY federal decision that involves states relies on the incorporation doctrine. School busing, desegregation, fair housing, public employment cases . . . I could go on all day. Of course, Roe vs. Wade is the penultimate 14th Amendment decision.

I think it is extremely important for us to understand this principle. Many of the things we argue against are based on this relatively simple doctrine. As stated above, some of the things we argue FOR are based on this principle. I hope to provide and outline some of the more pertinent cases for comment in the coming weeks. I welcome your feedback on this issue.

May 26, 2010

Mitt Romney announces Indiana Endorsements

Today, Mitt Romney’s Free and Strong America PAC announced the endorsement of the following five candidates in Indiana and announced it is sending them a total of $15,000 in contributions:

Dan Coats: Dan Coats has a long history of public service, having represented the people of Indiana in both the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate, and having served as a U.S. Ambassador to Germany. He is now running once again for U.S. Senate. For more information about him and his campaign, please visit www.coatsforindiana.com.

Larry Bucshon: Larry Bucshon, a successful heart surgeon, is now running to represent Indiana’s 8th Congressional District. For more information about him and his campaign, visit www.bucshonforcongress.com.

Todd Rokita: Todd Rokita currently serves as Indiana’s Secretary of State and is running to represent Indiana’s 4th Congressional District. For more information about him and his campaign, visit www.toddrokitaforcongress.com.

Todd Young: Todd Young, a Marine veteran and attorney, is running to represent Indiana’s 9th Congressional District. For more information about him and his campaign, please visit www.toddyoungforcongress.com.

Jackie Walorski: Jackie Walorski currently serves as an Indiana State Representative and is running to represent Indiana’s 2nd Congressional District. For more information about her and her campaign, please visit www.standwithjackie.com.

The PAC also announced that it is sending Dan Coats a maximum $5,000 general election contribution toward his U.S. Senate campaign, and that it is sending Larry Bucshon, Todd Rokita, Todd Young, and Jackie Walorski each a $2,500 general election contribution toward their respective Congressional campaigns.

“At a time when we need pro-growth leaders who will keep taxes low, cut wasteful spending and foster job creation, we instead have leadership in Washington which is more focused on expanding the scope and size of government. That is why it is critical that we elect leaders like Dan Coats, Larry Bucshon, Todd Rokita, Todd Young, and Jackie Walorski, who will work to create an environment conducive to creating jobs and turn our economy around,” said Romney.

These Indiana endorsements are another in a series of state rollouts of the PAC’s 2010 endorsements, which are aimed at electing conservative candidates who will work to lower taxes and spending, restore commonsense principles to healthcare and get our economy moving again. As part of this program, Romney’s PAC also has announced endorsements in Ohio, Missouri, California, Pennsylvania, Hawaii, Nevada, Illinois, Georgia, and Texas.

May 8, 2010

Am I a Racist?

I have been called a lot of names lately online and off. The most frequent label applied to me and other conservatives is “racist.”

I don’t consider myself racist, but only the most blatant separatists would consider themselves bigots. Thus, I take this charge seriously and it is worthwhile to do some self-inspection. I wish there was a simple test. Answer these questions and we will tell you whether you suffer from the mental disorder of racial hatred. There is not. Similar to the person who says “some of my best friends are black”, the response of most tea party movements to the charge of racism has been to parade a few minorities to refute the claims. I believe this does little to address the issue either way.

First, let me say that many people simply use the term racist because it has power in our society. This diminishes the struggle that those who have faced true discrimination in our society have had. Some of the more salient issues facing our society that most frequently bring up the race debate are:

Ø School Vouchers
Ø Foreign Debt Relief
Ø Welfare Reform
Ø Housing and Mortgage Reform

Words are extremely important and understanding what a term means is key to determining whether that word applies or not. Most people in our society do not understand what racism is and isn’t. They apply a “I know it when I see it” test. Merriam-Webster provides the following definition for racism:

Main Entry: rac·ism
Pronunciation: \ˈrā-ˌsi-zəm also -ˌshi-\
Function: noun
Date: 1933

1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race

2 : racial prejudice or discrimination

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism

The argument that I am racist is two-fold. First, people argue that I have become politically active primarily because a mixed race President was elected. That would be what I will call racism 1, based upon the above definition. I will deal with that argument later because I think it is the easier to deal with.

Racism 2 is a little more elusive. I would invite you to search disparate impact on findlaw.com to read more. A full discussion is well beyond the scope of this article and, in fact, volumes have been written. Suffice it to say that the term racist is now used to describe people who promote policies which may have a perceived negative impact on a particular race or ethnic group.

The difficulty for me arises in determining what impact is negative. Is an impact negative if it proves to be a detriment in the short term but a benefit in the long run? School voucher programs demonstrate this clearly. There is no question that inner-city schools that are under performing will receive less funding if school voucher programs are put in place. Without citing statistics, we can assume for purposes of this discussion that these schools frequently have a higher percentage of minority students, teachers and administrators. The question is whether the negative impact will be short-term or long-term. Whether society will be better served if some schools are forced to admit failure while allowing students to choose other schools. Reasonable people can differ as to the relative merits of such a program. Many invoke the racism label in the fight to maintain the status quo. It is clear to me though that reasonable people can come down on each side of this argument without regard to the race of those affected. Is race an issue for some people in this argument? Of course. Maybe I am overly optimistic in believing that most people would like to see a society that treats all of our children with equal respect and equal protection of the laws. A society that educates all of its children in a safe and productive environment and where each student can achieve to the best of his or her ability.

As for racism 1, there is no way to refute the claim because those who make it do not know me. They do not know what is in my heart and they do not take the time to analyze my words to determine if they evidence a racial bias. They do not want to. They simply want to refute any argument with the simplest possible explanation. This intellectual laziness is very dangerous in our society today and it is my hope that people of all races, faiths and political persuasions will join together to denounce it.

I welcome your thoughts and comments. As always, the opinions expressed here are solely those of the author. No implication of agreement is to be implied by any person or organization publishing these comments.

I thank you for taking the time to read one man’s simple thoughts for the day.

May 7, 2010

Welcome Losers

Dan “K Street” Coats successfully made a u-turn back to Meridian Street in the Republican Senate Primary. Mark “I AM the tea party” Leyva earned the opportunity to enter the Guinness Book of World Records for the longest losing streak in congressional campaign history. This has pundits across the state questioning the effectiveness of “the tea party.” Was it all for naught? Have we been completely ineffective?

This does cause me to question what we have been doing and where we should go from here. I hope we can address that issue together and it is my sincere hope that each of you (probably three or four will read this) will leave a constructive comment. Nonetheless, I believe that the pundits and prognosticators fail to understand the true nature of the tea party and write us off primarily because they want us to go away.

First, let’s revisit the Northwest Indiana Patriots mission.

To restore limited government, accountable representation, and fiscal responsibility through citizen activism and education, in order to preserve the Constitution of the United States of America. (emphasis supplied)

The mission is not to field candidates, win elections or even influence party platforms. Of course we will ultimately have to do all of the above if we are to have any true effectiveness. However our primary purpose is activism and education. I have been educated by many members of the NWI Patriots over the past several months and I have only attended a few events. Our message boards are full of information that I would not have otherwise known. I want to thank each of you for every post and I hope that you continue to provide useful and pertinent information.

Keep this in mind. The forces that we are going against are strong. The battle is a long one. There are literally billions of dollars at stake for some. No one is going to roll over and die but a few hundred people working hard can turn into a few thousand and then millions. We have to resist the influences of those who would like to co-opt our movement for their own gain. Republicans want to convert us and Democrats want to demonize us.

The question now is “Where do we go from here?” Are we losers because we were not a larger force in the outcome of this primary?
It is my hope that this campaign will strengthen our resolve to focus on our primary mission. No matter who the ultimate representatives are, we can force them to listen to the will of the people if we band together.

May 2, 2010

The Candidates and Our Misson

The Northwest Indiana Patriots stand for principals that are larger than any candidate.  While voting is one important aspect of our civic responsibility, our country was founded on the belief that an informed citizenry is the only defense to tyranny.  Today there are many who have realized this and would mislead and misinform us to disarm us-figuratively and literally.

In the coming weeks I hope to write much more about the relationship between limited government and freedom.  Those who would oppose us accuse us of having no answers to real problems.  Unfortunately, most of those problems are created by those who would offer simple solutions.  Like the fireman who lights a fire and then comes to your rescue, the solutions usually involve spending billions of dollars that we do not have with companies that support the incumbents.

We have had a wonderful opportunity to meet many of the candidates this election cycle.  For me, NWIP has served as a great source of information regarding candidate events and forums as well as the issues.  I thank all of you for that.  If you have not made up your mind regarding all the candidates this election, now is the time to get on the web and read up on the issues.  Be wary of misinformation and please try to remember our founding principles when voting.

This article was submitted by Ken Davidson.  As always, the opinions expressed herein are his and do not reflect the views of the Northwest Indiana Patriots and are not to be taken as an official position of this group or any member.

$1/2 Billion Dollars; Zero Job Creation

Regional development is a little like feeding children-how can anyone come out against it?  The idea of communities pooling resources to invest in infrastructure in order to promote growth is a great idea.  But lets not forget this is Northwest Indiana, so lets look at the history of the Regional Development Authority, the Regional Bus Authority and the proposed Regional Transit Authority.

The RDA 2009 annual report describes Catalyst as “an agent that provokes or speeds significant change.  The RDA website boasts:

The RDA has committed over $169.9 million to 16 projects through calendar year 2011. It has leveraged over $267.5 million from other funding sources. (http://www.in.gov/rda)

 

The RDA may receive funding from sources other than local taxation but it receives little or no funding other than tax money.  That means every dime of that $437 Million came from taxpayers.   Economic development expenditures should show some return over time.  Lets look at the potential economic return from the RDA expenditures:  (source RDA FY 2009 Report http://www.in.gov/rda/files/RDA_FY2009_Annual_Report.pdf):

 

1.  Gary/Chicago International Airport:  Although exact figures are hard to come by, The Gary Airport is the single largest recipient of RDA money and RDA future commitments (money that has been promised).  The RDA has invested well over $20 Million  into the Gary Airport.  Federal funds totaling over $30 Million have been secured during the same time period.  The plan is to invest over $100 Million into the airport in the next 5 years.

 

2.  South Shore Railroad:  I think most people in the region are resigned to supporting the South Shore Railroad.  The funding for the South Shore would have probably been the same or near the same with or without the RDA.  Those in the southern portions of the counties may, in all fairness, object to their local tax money being used to fund a program that probably should be funded primarily by the state.

 

3.  Regional Bus Service:  The RDA is not allowed, by statute, to contribute to the operating budget of a bus service.  The RDA has contributed over $8.7 Million to regional bus studies and capital expenditures.  The people of the region should be informed as to the long term proposed costs and plan for regional bus service. Is there a demand for bus service from East Chicago to Lowell and Michigan City?  Do people in Valparaiso want to pay for buses from Gary to Valparaiso?  The RDA funding only sets up a program that will cost billions into the future.

 

4.  Lakefront Development:   The RDA has invested approximately $80 Million into what it terms “shoreline development.”  These expenditures are  largely related to Representative Visclosky’s Marquette Plan for the region.   Quality of life issues are certainly important to economic development but reasonable people can differ as to the expenditures here.  One point to be made, however, is that much of the money for the RDA comes from casino revenue, thus it is logical that the RDA would invest back into the shoreline.  Nonetheless, Lake Michigan is an important national asset.  The Federal Government has not done enough to clean up and revitalize the blighted areas of Hammond, East Chicago, Gary, Portage and Michigan City.  It is noteworthy that the majority of federal funding that RDA boasts securing is for lakefront projects.

 

In a time when unemployment is hovering at ten percent; school corporations are laying off teachers and towns are raising fees on everything from trash collection to sewer usage, it seems to me that this $437 Million investment has not been well spent.  I would invite comment from anyone who can point to jobs that were created by these expenditures and any significant return in the form of taxes on any expenditure by the RDA.

 

Should we get out of the RDA?  I hope that each of you will take a look at your area and the concerns that you have this election day.  Make no mistake that this election is about the future of the region and there are two distinct viewpoints.  Those who want to continue to push transportation and government funded jobs and those who want to invest in real economic development.

 

This article was submitted by Ken Davidson.  As always, the opinions expressed herein are his and do not reflect the views of the Northwest Indiana Patriots and are not to be taken as an official position of this group or any member.

 

 

 

April 30, 2010

Endorsements:

We The People: NorthWest Indiana Patriots, has not and will not endorse any candidates for the primary.

You may have heard member of NorthWest Indidna Patiots name associated with endorsements….this is true. We have members and board members that have personally endorsed candidates. We have no control of how the media or candidates use that information for radio spots and print media. That is the opinions and right of these individuals to pursue what is right in their lives. Personally if I was a candidate I would be proud to receive an endorsement from a member of NorthWest Indiana Patriots.

So for the record……NorthWest Indiana Patriots has not and will not endorse any candidates for the primary. Post primary we intend to continue to educate ourselves and our membership on the election candidates and score them against our mission statement. Candidates with a higher percentage of matching to our group and movement will be obvious choices even if we elect to not endorse them.

April 7, 2010

September 2, 2009 Healthcare Counter-March

March 22, 2010

John Berry is flying in from Atlanta to sing at the NWIP’s April 14th Tea Party!

Mr. John Berry will be playing at Northwest Indiana Patriots Tea Party on April 14, 2010! Thank you John!

John Edward Berry was born on September 14, 1959 in Aiken, South Carolina, to James and Marie Berry, and raised in the Atlanta, Georgiaarea. His father listened to concert pianist Van Cliburn, his mother had a strong taste for gospel, and his brother became an opera singer. Berry gravitated to both soul and country music and began recording his own albums at home in 1979.

Two years later, John started performing solo acoustic shows in northeast Georgia,including performing in the parking lot of Sanford Stadium after Georgia Bulldogs home football games, then expanded around the southeast, building a strong name and following. He eventually made six self-produced albums, with the last one selling over 10,000 copies. He was finally signed to Liberty Records in 1992.

Visit John Berry online at http://johnberry.musiccitynetworks.com/

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress